↓ Skip to main content

Chagas disease: What is known and what should be improved: a systemic review

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chagas disease: What is known and what should be improved: a systemic review
Published in
Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical, June 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0037-86822012000300002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Argentina 1 3%
Unknown 33 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 6 18%
Student > Bachelor 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 11 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2018.
All research outputs
#11,641,084
of 33,087,078 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#315
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,844
of 204,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,087,078 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.