↓ Skip to main content

Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial

Overview of attention for article published in Clinics, July 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
112 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Conventional approach x laparoscopic abdominoperineal resection for rectal cancer treatment after neoadjuvant chemoradiation: results of a prospective randomized trial
Published in
Clinics, July 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0041-87812003000300002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sergio Eduardo Alonso Araujo, Afonso Henrique da Silva e Sousa, Fábio Guilherme Caserta Marysael de Campos, Angelita Habr-Gama, Rodrigo Blanco Dumarco, Pedro Paulo de Paris Caravatto, Sergio Carlos Nahas, José Hyppólito da Silva, Desidério Roberto Kiss, Joaquim José Gama-Rodrigues

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 37 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 21%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Postgraduate 4 11%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Unknown 7 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2020.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Clinics
#327
of 1,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,608
of 53,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them