↓ Skip to main content

Como ampliar o debate e a utilidade das comunicações científicas: as revistas de acesso livre

Overview of attention for article published in Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Como ampliar o debate e a utilidade das comunicações científicas: as revistas de acesso livre
Published in
Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, February 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0066-782x2012000200013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guilherme Ribeiro Camara

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 25%
Unknown 3 75%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 75%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 25%
Social Sciences 1 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2012.
All research outputs
#20,155,513
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#869
of 1,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,690
of 247,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia
#11
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,070 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.