↓ Skip to main content

Dispersal of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in an urban endemic dengue area in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, May 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,847)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
49 X users

Readers on

mendeley
458 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dispersal of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in an urban endemic dengue area in the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, May 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0074-02762003000200005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 458 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Madagascar 2 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Unknown 445 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 96 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 73 16%
Student > Master 67 15%
Student > Bachelor 39 9%
Other 36 8%
Other 83 18%
Unknown 64 14%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 187 41%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 9%
Environmental Science 42 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 39 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 3%
Other 65 14%
Unknown 71 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2023.
All research outputs
#855,326
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#15
of 1,847 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#800
of 76,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#2
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,847 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 76,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.