↓ Skip to main content

Assessing key safety concerns of a Wolbachia-based strategy to control dengue transmission by Aedes mosquitoes

Overview of attention for article published in Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#15 of 1,516)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
9 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
72 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
261 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing key safety concerns of a Wolbachia-based strategy to control dengue transmission by Aedes mosquitoes
Published in
Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, April 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0074-02762010000800002
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jean Popovici, Luciano A Moreira, Anne Poinsignon, Inaki Iturbe-Ormaetxe, Darlene McNaughton, Scott L O'Neill

Abstract

Mosquito-borne diseases such as dengue fever, chikungunya or malaria affect millions of people each year and control solutions are urgently needed. An international research program is currently being developed that relies on the introduction of the bacterial endosymbiont Wolbachia pipientis into Aedes aegypti to control dengue transmission. In order to prepare for open-field testing releases of Wolbachia-infected mosquitoes, an intensive social research and community engagement program was undertaken in Cairns, Northern Australia. The most common concern expressed by the diverse range of community members and stakeholders surveyed was the necessity of assuring the safety of the proposed approach for humans, animals and the environment. To address these concerns a series of safety experiments were undertaken. We report in this paper on the experimental data obtained, discuss the limitations of experimental risk assessment and focus on the necessity of including community concerns in scientific research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 261 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 247 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 55 21%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 13%
Student > Bachelor 33 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 5%
Other 44 17%
Unknown 47 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 91 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 31 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 10%
Immunology and Microbiology 10 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 3%
Other 38 15%
Unknown 57 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#793,064
of 25,913,612 outputs
Outputs from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#15
of 1,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,740
of 122,291 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,913,612 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,516 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,291 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them