↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Disease in the Elderly: Spirituality and Coping*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Chronic Disease in the Elderly: Spirituality and Coping*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2014
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420140000800014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This is an exploratory study using a qualitative methodology which aimed to identify and understand the role of spirituality in the management of chronic disease in the elderly. The discourse analysis revealed the following central themes: multidimensional impact of chronic diseases, coping and expectations of the elderly. Regarding coping with chronic diseases, the individual coping, social support and religiosity/spirituality/faith were analyzed. The results showed the changes brought about the diagnosis of chronic disease and its implications for the adaptation to the new way of life. The management of these changes is complex and many factors influence positively and negatively in order to deal with the new condition. The results showed that spirituality/religiosity /faith interfere positively in addressing the barriers and difficulties of life, strengthening the resilience of the patient, thus improving their quality of life.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 98 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 6%
Other 20 20%
Unknown 36 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 20 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 15%
Social Sciences 8 8%
Psychology 7 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 37 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
#19,158,222
of 27,784,943 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#307
of 825 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,289
of 377,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,784,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 825 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.