↓ Skip to main content

Modes of acquisition of health literacy skills in informal learning contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Modes of acquisition of health literacy skills in informal learning contexts
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, December 2014
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420140000800016
Pubmed ID
Authors

António Geraldo Manso Calha

Abstract

In this article we try to analyze the learning processes of health literacy skills in informal contexts. We intend to broaden the understanding of the learning process beyond the formal contexts, thus contributing to the elucidation of health professionals on how individuals acquire and manage their knowledge in health matters. Given our goal, we use an analytic corpus constituted by one hundred autobiographical narratives written between 2006 and 2011, in educational contexts but with recognized potential for use in different scientific fields, including health. The results reveal the existence of three different types of modes of learning health literacy skills in informal context: : i) learning that takes place in action, in achieving daily tasks; ii) learning processes that result from problem solving; iii) learning that occurs in an unplanned manner, resulting from accidental circumstances and, in some cases, devoid of intentionality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 24 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 35%
Researcher 4 15%
Student > Bachelor 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Other 4 15%
Unknown 2 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 27%
Psychology 5 19%
Social Sciences 4 15%
Philosophy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 April 2015.
All research outputs
#16,722,190
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#267
of 771 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#216,665
of 369,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 771 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.