↓ Skip to main content

Educação interprofissional e prática colaborativa na Atenção Primária à Saúde*

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
139 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Educação interprofissional e prática colaborativa na Atenção Primária à Saúde*
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420150000800003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jaqueline Alcântara Marcelino da Silva, Marina Peduzzi, Carole Orchard, Valéria Marli Leonello

Abstract

Objective To understand the perceptions of professors, health care providers and students about the articulation of interprofessional education with health practices in Primary Health Care. Method To understand and interpret qualitative data collection, carried out between 2012 and 2013, through semi-structured interviews with 18 professors and four sessions of homogeneous focus groups with students, professors and health care providers of Primary Health Care. Results A triangulation of the results led to the construction of two categories: user-centered collaborative practice and barriers to interprofessional education. The first perspective indicates the need to change the model of care and training of health professionals, while the second reveals difficulties perceived by stakeholders regarding the implementation of interprofessional education. Conclusion The interprofessional education is incipient in the Brazil and the results of this analysis point out to possibilities of change toward collaborative practice, but require higher investments primarily in developing teaching-health services relationship.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 139 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 25 18%
Student > Master 13 9%
Researcher 10 7%
Professor 8 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 57 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 36 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 53 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,944,091
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#546
of 772 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,536
of 361,169 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#7
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 772 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,169 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.