↓ Skip to main content

Webquest e história em quadrinhos na formação de recursos humanos em Enfermagem

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Webquest e história em quadrinhos na formação de recursos humanos em Enfermagem
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2015
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420150000800010
Pubmed ID
Authors

Harriet Bárbara Maruxo, Cláudia Prado, Denise Maria de Almeida, Lucia Tobase, Manoela Gomes Grossi, Débora Rodrigues Vaz

Abstract

Objective To describe the process of constructing and implementation of Webquest as pedagogical strategy as guiding the study about the pedagogical concepts using Comic. Method The first stage of the study was outlined applied research of technological production. The second stage was characterized as research exploratory, descriptive documentary for the analysis of Comic. in the teaching diploma in Nursing of EEUSP in 2013. Results The proposed Webquest was implemented, resulting in 18 Comic. All Pedagogical Concepts studied were addressed; used the software indicated and the power point, the plots developed in different scenarios and most Comic contemplated mandatory items. Conclusion The use of different technological resources provide learning, by mobilizing multiple potentialities, abilities and interests of students, favoring the construction of collective and collaborative learning, strengthening important and necessary features in training that will influence the human resource profile in tune with the aspirations of the labor market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 30 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 5 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 13%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Other 3 10%
Student > Master 3 10%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 8 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 11 37%
Social Sciences 4 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 10%
Engineering 2 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 8 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2016.
All research outputs
#20,937,993
of 25,715,849 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#577
of 785 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#271,115
of 363,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#9
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,715,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 785 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.