↓ Skip to main content

Aromatherapy and nursing: historical and theoretical conception

Overview of attention for article published in Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
264 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Aromatherapy and nursing: historical and theoretical conception
Published in
Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP, February 2016
DOI 10.1590/s0080-623420160000100017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Aromatherapy is a Practical or Complementary Health Therapy that uses volatile concentrates extracted from plants called essential oils, in order to improve physical, mental and emotional well-being. Aromatherapy has been practiced historically and worldwide by nurses and, as in Brazil is supported by the Federal Nursing Council, it is relevant to discuss this practice in the context of Nursing through Theories of Nursing. This study of theoretical reflection, exploratory and descriptive, aims to discuss the pharmacognosy of essential oils, the historical trajectory of Aromatherapy in Nursing and the conceptions to support Aromatherapy in light of eight Nursing Theorists (Florence Nightingale, Myra Levine, Hildegard Peplau, Martha Rogers, Callista Roy, Wanda Horta, Jean Watson and Katharine Kolcaba), contributing to its inclusion as a nursing care practice.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 38 14%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Postgraduate 16 6%
Lecturer 15 6%
Researcher 14 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 123 47%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 64 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 5%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 2%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 124 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2022.
All research outputs
#8,478,184
of 26,743,793 outputs
Outputs from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#70
of 807 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,992
of 411,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP
#3
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,743,793 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 807 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 411,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.