You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Arsenic toxicity in Acacia mangium willd. and mimosa Caesalpiniaefolia benth. seedlings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-06832013000500031 |
| Authors |
Henrique Nery Cipriani, Luiz Eduardo Dias, Maurício Dutra Costa, Naiara Viana Campos, Aristéa Alves Azevedo, Roberto Junio Gomes, Izabela Ferreira Fialho, Sandra Patrícia Montealegre Amezquita |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 April 2016.
All research outputs
#3,798,287
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#8
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,712
of 307,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,714 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them