↓ Skip to main content

Ecological alphabetization

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 120)

Mentioned by

googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
27 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Ecological alphabetization
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica, June 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0100-55022009000500014
Authors

Rodrigo Siqueira-Batista, Giselle Rôças

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 7%
Unknown 25 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Professor 4 15%
Student > Master 3 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Other 1 4%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 10 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 26%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Social Sciences 2 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
#46
of 120 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,573
of 123,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Educação Médica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 120 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,460 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them