↓ Skip to main content

Morfologia e desenvolvimento germinativo de Oenocarpus bacaba mart. (arecaceae) da Amazônia Ocidental

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Árvore, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morfologia e desenvolvimento germinativo de Oenocarpus bacaba mart. (arecaceae) da Amazônia Ocidental
Published in
Revista Árvore, March 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0100-67622009000600006
Authors

Maria Sílvia de Mendonça Queiroz, Rosemary Bianco

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Unspecified 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 46%
Chemistry 2 15%
Environmental Science 1 8%
Unspecified 1 8%
Unknown 3 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 May 2023.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Revista Árvore
#15
of 81 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,228
of 102,259 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Árvore
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 81 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,259 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them