↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Análise de crescimento de biótipos de amendoim-bravo (Euphorbia heterophylla) resistente e suscetível aos herbicidas inibidores da ALS
Published in
Planta Daninha, January 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0100-83582001000100006
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Unknown 1 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 80%
Unknown 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#10,085,107
of 29,376,261 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#17
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,049
of 192,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,376,261 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them