You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
BIOLOGICAL ACTIVITIES AND NOVEL APPLICATIONS OF CHALCONES1
|
---|---|
Published in |
Planta Daninha, September 2016
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0100-83582016340300022 |
Authors |
C. DÍAZ-TIELAS, E. GRAÑA, M.J. REIGOSA, A.M. SÁNCHEZ-MOREIRAS |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 89 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 16 | 18% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 11% |
Researcher | 6 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Other | 15 | 17% |
Unknown | 31 | 35% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Chemistry | 24 | 27% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
Engineering | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 37 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2016.
All research outputs
#17,348,916
of 25,457,858 outputs
Outputs from Planta Daninha
#48
of 70 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#228,529
of 348,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Planta Daninha
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,457,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 70 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 348,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.