You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biologia floral de Cleistes macrantha (Barb. Rodr.) Schltr. (Orchidaceae: Vanilloideae: Pogoniinae)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Brazilian Journal of Botany, March 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0100-84042003000100008 |
| Authors |
Emerson R. Pansarin |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| Peru | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Serbia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 28 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 16% |
| Professor | 6 | 14% |
| Researcher | 5 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 10 | 23% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 34 | 77% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Engineering | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 4 | 9% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,784,015
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Botany
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,472
of 63,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Botany
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them