↓ Skip to main content

The brain decade in debate: VII. Neurobiology of sleep and dreams

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, December 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#27 of 1,254)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The brain decade in debate: VII. Neurobiology of sleep and dreams
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, December 2001
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2001001200002
Pubmed ID
Authors

F. Aloe, F. Amzica, W. Hening, L. Menna-Barreto, L.R. Pinto, R. Velluti, R. Vertes, C. Timo-Iaria

Abstract

This article is a transcription of an electronic symposium held on February 5, 2001 by the Brazilian Society of Neuroscience and Behavior (SBNeC) during which eight specialists involved in clinical and experimental research on sleep and dreaming exposed their personal experience and theoretical points of view concerning these highly polemic subjects. Unlike most other bodily functions, sleep and dreaming cannot, so far, be defined in terms of definitive functions that play an ascribable role in maintaining the organism as a whole. Such difficulties appear quite clearly all along the discussions. In this symposium, concepts on sleep function range from a protective behavior to an essential function for maturation of the nervous system. Kleitman's hypothesis [Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1974), 159: 293-294] was discussed, according to which the basal state is not the wakeful state but sleep, from which we awake to eat, to protect ourselves, to procreate, etc. Dreams, on the other hand, were widely discussed, being considered either as an important step in consolidation of learning or simply the conscious identification of functional patterns derived from the configuration of released or revoked memorized information.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 43 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 16%
Professor 8 16%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 12%
Other 11 22%
Unknown 3 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 22%
Neuroscience 9 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 18%
Psychology 5 10%
Physics and Astronomy 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,253,435
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#27
of 1,254 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,666
of 132,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research
#1
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,254 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them