↓ Skip to main content

Examining life-course influences on chronic disease: the importance of birth cohort studies from low- and middle- income countries. An overview

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Examining life-course influences on chronic disease: the importance of birth cohort studies from low- and middle- income countries. An overview
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, March 2008
DOI 10.1590/s0100-879x2007000900015
Pubmed ID
Authors

G.D. Batty, J.G. Alves, J Correia, D.A. Lawlor

Abstract

The objectives of this overview are to describe the past and potential contributions of birth cohorts to understanding chronic disease aetiology; advance a justification for the maintenance of birth cohorts from low- and middle-income countries (LMIC); provide an audit of birth cohorts from LMIC; and, finally, offer possible future directions for this sphere of research. While the contribution of birth cohorts from affluent societies to understanding disease aetiology has been considerable, we describe several reasons to anticipate why the results from such studies might not be directly applied to LMIC. More than any other developing country, Brazil has a tradition of establishing, maintaining and exploiting birth cohort studies. The clear need for a broader geographical representation may be precipitated by a greater collaboration worldwide in the sharing of ideas, fieldwork experience, and cross-country cohort data comparisons in order to carry out the best science in the most efficient manner. This requires the involvement of a central overseeing body--such as the World Health Organization--that has the respect of all countries and the capacity to develop strategic plans for 'global' life-course epidemiology while addressing such issues as data-sharing. For rapid progress to be made, however, there must be minimal bureaucratic entanglements.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 60 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 14%
Researcher 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 13%
Student > Bachelor 3 5%
Professor 3 5%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 21 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 33%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 26 41%