↓ Skip to main content

Can future systemic financial risks be quantified?: ergodic vs nonergodic stochastic processes

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, May 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Can future systemic financial risks be quantified?: ergodic vs nonergodic stochastic processes
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Political Economy, May 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0101-31572009000400001
Authors

Paul Davidson

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 19%
Student > Master 2 13%
Other 1 6%
Professor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 13%
Energy 1 6%
Social Sciences 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2013.
All research outputs
#20,374,869
of 29,299,206 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
#210
of 307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,254
of 117,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Political Economy
#10
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,299,206 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 307 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 117,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.