↓ Skip to main content

A review of the genus Oryssomus Mulsant (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Exoplectrinae, Oryssomini) and description of Gordonoryssomus, gen.n.

Overview of attention for article published in Zoologia, July 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of the genus Oryssomus Mulsant (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae, Exoplectrinae, Oryssomini) and description of Gordonoryssomus, gen.n.
Published in
Zoologia, July 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0101-81751995000300024
Authors

Lúcia Massutti de Almeida, Iracilda Maria de Moura Lima

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 25%
Brazil 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 50%
Librarian 1 25%
Student > Bachelor 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2022.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,980
of 124,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 124,467 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them