↓ Skip to main content

Biometric notes on Tupiperla Froehlich (Plecoptera, Gripopterygidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Zoologia, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Biometric notes on Tupiperla Froehlich (Plecoptera, Gripopterygidae)
Published in
Zoologia, June 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0101-81751999000600018
Authors

Claudio G. Froehlich

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 17%
United Kingdom 1 4%
Unknown 18 78%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 26%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Professor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 2 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 18 78%
Unspecified 1 4%
Environmental Science 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Unknown 2 9%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2017.
All research outputs
#8,785,110
of 25,992,468 outputs
Outputs from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,908
of 127,277 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Zoologia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,992,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,277 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them