↓ Skip to main content

Critérios de autoria e co-autoria em trabalhos científicos

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Botanica Brasilica, June 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Critérios de autoria e co-autoria em trabalhos científicos
Published in
Acta Botanica Brasilica, June 2011
DOI 10.1590/s0102-33061997000200014
Authors

Mano R Montenegro, Venâncio A. Ferreira Alves

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 7%
Unknown 54 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 12 21%
Student > Master 8 14%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 12%
Professor 4 7%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Environmental Science 5 9%
Social Sciences 4 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 15 26%
Unknown 13 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,286,763
of 26,745,262 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#260
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,716
of 128,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#16
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,745,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.