You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Medicinal plants used by the Kaiowá and Guarani indigenous populations in the Caarapó Reserve, Mato Grosso do Sul, Brazil
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Botanica Brasilica, August 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-33062005000100005 |
| Authors |
Norlene Regina Bueno, Rachel Oliveira Castilho, Reginaldo Brito da Costa, Arnildo Pott, Vali J. Pott, Gessiel Newton Scheidt, Marcelo da Silva Batista |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 64 | 98% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2018.
All research outputs
#6,526,077
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#19
of 380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,572
of 68,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Botanica Brasilica
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 68,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them