You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Adamantinoma de ossos longos
|
---|---|
Published in |
Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia, August 2008
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0102-36162008000800005 |
Authors |
José Donato de Próspero, Pedro Péricles Ribeiro Baptista, Elio Consentino, Cláudia de Cássia Tanoue Hasegawa, Maria Fernanda Carriel Amary, Eduardo Sadao Yonamine |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 20% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 20% |
Other | 1 | 20% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 60% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 May 2015.
All research outputs
#23,320,957
of 25,988,468 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,435
of 98,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Ortopedia
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,988,468 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.2. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.