↓ Skip to main content

As marcas da cidade: a dinâmica da pixação em São Paulo

Overview of attention for article published in Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
As marcas da cidade: a dinâmica da pixação em São Paulo
Published in
Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política, July 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0102-64452010000100007
Authors

Alexandre Barbosa Pereira

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,200,695
of 31,520,336 outputs
Outputs from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#165
of 327 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,268
of 134,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Lua Nova: Revista de Cultura e Política
#8
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,520,336 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 327 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.