↓ Skip to main content

Cisto pericárdico gigante: relato de caso

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, September 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cisto pericárdico gigante: relato de caso
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular, September 2007
DOI 10.1590/s0102-76382007000300013
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinicius José da Silva Nina, Norman Colina Eduardo Manzano, Vinícius Giuliano Gonçalves Mendes, Natalino Salgado Filho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#20,656,161
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#214
of 363 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,592
of 81,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 363 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 81,074 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them