↓ Skip to main content

Effect of topical application of fibronectin in duodenal wound healing in rats

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of topical application of fibronectin in duodenal wound healing in rats
Published in
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, March 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0102-86502003000200005
Authors

Teresa Neuma de Souza Brito, Luiz Reginaldo Menezes da Rocha, Carlos André Nunes Jatobá, Maurício Pereira Sales, Aldo da Cunha Medeiros

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 50%
Professor 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Materials Science 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2018.
All research outputs
#8,783,469
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#1
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,472
of 63,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one scored the same or higher as 2 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them