↓ Skip to main content

Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, March 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative study on ureteroscopic lithotripsy and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy for treatment of unilateral upper ureteral stones
Published in
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, March 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0102-86502012000300011
Pubmed ID
Authors

You-qiang Fang, Jian-guang Qiu, De-juan Wang, Hai-lun Zhan, Jie Situ

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2012.
All research outputs
#23,319,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,139
of 169,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them