You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Portland cement with additives in the repair of furcation perforations in dogs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-86502012001100011 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
José Dias da Silva Neto, Taylor Brandão Schnaider, Alfredo Gragnani, Anderson Paulo de Paiva, Neil Ferreira Novo, Lydia Masako Ferreira |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the use of Portland cements with additives as furcation perforation repair materials and assess their biocompatibility. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 25 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 23 | 92% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2012.
All research outputs
#23,319,379
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#2
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#183,316
of 203,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Cirurgica Brasileira
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.2. This one scored the same or higher as 1 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 203,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them