| Title |
Evaluation of the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of green tea (Camellia sinensis) in mice1
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s0102-865020150040000002 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matheus Alves de Lima Mota, José Saul Peixoto Landim, Thiago Sousa Silva Targino, Silvia Fernandes Ribeiro da Silva, Sônia Leite da Silva, Márcio Roberto Pinho Pereira |
| Abstract |
To evaluate the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of green tea (Camellia sinensis) in mice. The anti-inflammatory effect of alcoholic extracts of green tea (AE) was evaluated in a cell migration assay with four groups of six Swiss mice receiving 0.07g/Kg or 0.14g/Kg EA (treatment groups), saline (negative control) or 10mg/Kg indomethacin (positive control) by gavage. One hour later 300 µg carrageen an was administered intraperitoneally or subcutaneously. The analgesic effect was evaluated using four groups of six animals receiving 0.07g/Kg or 0.14g/Kg EA, saline or 10mg/Kg indomethacin subcutaneously, followed 30 minutes later by 1% acetic acid. When administered subcutaneously at either dose (0.07g/Kg and 0.14g/Kg), AE inhibited carrageenan-induced cell migration (p<0.05). However, when administered by gavage, only the latter (0.14 g/Kg) was efficient (p<0.05). AE at both doses (0.07g/Kg and 0.14g/Kg) inhibited abdominal contortions (p<0.05), but the effect was not dose-dependent. Green tea was shown to have analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and may constitute a natural treatment option in chronic inflammatory disorders. |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
Mendeley demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 16% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 6 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 8% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 26 | 51% |