↓ Skip to main content

Estratégia de detecção precoce e redução de mortalidade na sepse grave

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, June 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estratégia de detecção precoce e redução de mortalidade na sepse grave
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva, June 2009
DOI 10.1590/s0103-507x2009000200001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glauco Adrieno Westphal, Janaína Feijó, Patrícia Silva de Andrade, Louise Trindade, Cezar Suchard, Márcio Andrei Gil Monteiro, Sheila Fonseca Martins, Fernanda Nunes, Milton Caldeira Filho

Abstract

To evaluate the impact of implementing an institutional policy for detection of severe sepsis and septic shock. Study before (stage I), after (stage II) with prospective data collection in a 195 bed public hospital.. Stage I: Patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were included consecutively over 15 months and treated according to the Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines. Stage II: In the 10 subsequent months, patients with severe sepsis or septic shock were enrolled based on an active search for signs suggesting infection (SSI) in hospitalized patients. The two stages were compared for demographic variables, time needed for recognition of at least two signs suggesting infection (SSI-Δt), compliance to the bundles of 6 and 24 hours and mortality. We identified 124 patients with severe sepsis or septic shock, 68 in stage I and 56 in stage II. The demographic variables were similar in both stages. The Δt-SSI was 34 ± 54 hours in stage I and 7 ± 8.4 hours in stage II (p <0.001). There was no difference in compliance to the bundles. In parallel there was significant reduction of mortality rates at 28 days (54.4% versus 30%, p <0.02) and hospital (67.6% versus 41%, p <0.003). The strategy used helped to identify early risk of sepsis and resulted in decreased mortality associated with severe sepsis and septic shock.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 50%
Student > Master 5 14%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Researcher 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 5 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 6%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 5 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#163
of 350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,291
of 125,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Terapia Intensiva
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.