↓ Skip to main content

Luzes e sombras: sobre a noção de conhecimento paranóico em Jacques Lacan

Overview of attention for article published in Psicologia Clínica, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Luzes e sombras: sobre a noção de conhecimento paranóico em Jacques Lacan
Published in
Psicologia Clínica, February 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0103-56652009000200022
Authors

Ludmilla Eugenio de Souza Gusmão Cavalcanti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2017.
All research outputs
#17,285,036
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia Clínica
#22
of 49 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,165
of 102,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia Clínica
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 49 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 27 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.