↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Dental Journal, April 2003
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#3 of 326)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
5 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
1105 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite
Published in
Brazilian Dental Journal, April 2003
DOI 10.1590/s0103-64402002000200007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The choice of an irrigating solution for use in infected root canals requires previous knowledge of the microorganisms responsible for the infectious process as well as the properties of different irrigating solutions. Complex internal anatomy, host defenses and microorganism virulence are important factors in the treatment of teeth with asymptomatic apical periodontitis. Irrigating solutions must have expressive antimicrobial action and tissue dissolution capacity. Sodium hypochlorite is the most used irrigating solution in endodontics, because its mechanism of action causes biosynthetic alterations in cellular metabolism and phospholipid destruction, formation of chloramines that interfere in cellular metabolism, oxidative action with irreversible enzymatic inactivation in bacteria, and lipid and fatty acid degradation. The aim of this work is to discuss the mechanism of action of sodium hypochlorite based on its antimicrobial and physico-chemical properties.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 3 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1094 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 143 13%
Student > Bachelor 124 11%
Student > Postgraduate 101 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 61 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 57 5%
Other 138 12%
Unknown 481 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 336 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 88 8%
Engineering 31 3%
Chemistry 31 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 30 3%
Other 90 8%
Unknown 499 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#2,252,380
of 32,330,461 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#3
of 326 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,062
of 84,287 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,330,461 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 326 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 84,287 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them