You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Method for determination of root curvature radius using cone-beam computed tomography images
|
---|---|
Published in |
Brazilian Dental Journal, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-64402008000200005 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carlos Estrela, Mike Reis Bueno, Manoel Damião Sousa-Neto, Jesus Djalma Pécora |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Brazil | 4 | 2% |
United States | 2 | <1% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
France | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 203 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 36 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 34 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 5% |
Other | 38 | 18% |
Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 120 | 57% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
Engineering | 3 | 1% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 1% |
Other | 5 | 2% |
Unknown | 66 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2024.
All research outputs
#3,951,301
of 26,139,724 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#11
of 286 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,120
of 98,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,139,724 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 286 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,305 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them