↓ Skip to main content

Tooth wear in patients submitted to bariatric surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Dental Journal, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Tooth wear in patients submitted to bariatric surgery
Published in
Brazilian Dental Journal, May 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0103-64402012000200012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria do Socorro Coêlho Alves, Fernando Alberto Costa Cardoso da Silva, Stephanie Gomes Araújo, Antônio Cláudio Almeida de Carvalho, Alcione Miranda Santos, Andrea Lúcia Almeida de Carvalho

Abstract

Bariatric surgery may cause frequent vomiting episodes and gastroesophageal reflux, which promote the contact of gastric acids with the teeth leading to irreversible loss of tooth structure. The aim of this study was to assess prevalence of tooth wear in bariatric patients. One hundred and twenty-five patients were examined at a Public Hospital in São Luis, MA, Brazil, between July and October 2010, being patients who had already been submitted to the bariatric surgery at least 6 months previously (Bariatric group), morbidly obese patients who were on the waiting list for this surgery (Obese group) and patients who were waiting for ambulatory medical care in other sectors (Control group). The patients answered an investigative questionnaire and were clinically examined using the Basic Erosive Wear Examination (BEWE) scoring system, which allows the classification of the severity of noncarious dental lesions (NCDL) and evaluation of risk. All patients presented some degree of tooth wear at different levels. However, the presence of NCDL was associated with the group to which the patient belonged. The bariatric patients showed higher prevalence and a statistically significant level of risk with regard to NCDLs when compared with the other patients, followed by the obese and control groups. Reflux and vomiting did not seem to influence NCDL positively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 72 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 26%
Student > Bachelor 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 15 21%
Unknown 18 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Engineering 2 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 23 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 August 2012.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Dental Journal
#197
of 284 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,223
of 178,898 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Dental Journal
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 284 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 178,898 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.