↓ Skip to main content

The ethical-esthetic possibilities of perversion: a polymorphous-perverse sexuality as a practice of freedom in Marcuse

Overview of attention for article published in Psicologia USP, July 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#41 of 259)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The ethical-esthetic possibilities of perversion: a polymorphous-perverse sexuality as a practice of freedom in Marcuse
Published in
Psicologia USP, July 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0103-65642012005000005
Authors

Leomir Cardoso Hilário, Eduardo Leal Cunha

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,107
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Psicologia USP
#41
of 259 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,809
of 177,520 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psicologia USP
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 259 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 177,520 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.