You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
DIAGNÓSTICO ETIOLÓGICO DE CATARROS GENITAIS EM VACAS LEITERAS
|
---|---|
Published in |
Ciência Rural, September 2014
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-84781992000200016 |
Authors |
João Lari Félix Cordeiro, Jairo Pereira Neves, Antonio Jorge Dreon de Albuquerque, Manoel Renato Teles Badke |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,378,039
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Ciência Rural
#353
of 2,241 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,194
of 250,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ciência Rural
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,241 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 250,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.