You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Response of the grass-cutting ant Atta capiguara Gonçalves, 1944 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) to sugars and artificial sweeteners
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientia Agricola, August 2003
|
DOI | 10.1590/s0103-90162003000300014 |
Authors |
Maria Aparecida Castellani Boaretto, Luiz Carlos Forti, Juliane Floriano Santos Lopes, Nilson Satoru Nagamoto, Ana Paula Protti de Andrade, Aldenise Alves Moreira, Anselmo Eloy Silveira Viana, Vânia Maria Ramos |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 27 | 96% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Scientia Agricola
#66
of 253 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,794
of 53,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientia Agricola
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 253 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 53,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them