↓ Skip to main content

Sanadores inesperados: medicina china en la era de migración global (Lima y California, 1850-1930)

Overview of attention for article published in História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Sanadores inesperados: medicina china en la era de migración global (Lima y California, 1850-1930)
Published in
História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos, March 2018
DOI 10.1590/s0104-59702018000100002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The massive waves of Chinese migrants arriving in California and Lima in the second half of the nineteenth century played a crucial role in expanding Chinese medicine in both settings. From the late 1860s on, herbalists expanded their healing system beyond their ethnic community, transforming Chinese medicine into one of the healing practices most widely adopted by the local population. This article uses a comparative approach to examine the diverging trajectories of Chinese healers in Peru and the USA, as well as the social and political factors that determined how this foreign medical knowledge adapted to its new environments.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 7 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2018.
All research outputs
#22,681,702
of 27,764,304 outputs
Outputs from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#1,558
of 1,642 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#275,432
of 349,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age from História, Ciências, Saúde-Manguinhos
#15
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,764,304 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,642 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,515 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.