↓ Skip to main content

The effect of inoculation of an indigenous bacteria on the early growth of Acacia farnesiana in a degraded area

Overview of attention for article published in CERNE, April 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of inoculation of an indigenous bacteria on the early growth of Acacia farnesiana in a degraded area
Published in
CERNE, April 2013
DOI 10.1590/s0104-77602012000100007
Authors

Eliane Ceccon, Anayeli Almazo-Rogel, Esperanza Martínez-Romero, Ivonne Toledo

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Unknown 15 94%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#8,533,995
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from CERNE
#4
of 22 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,491
of 212,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CERNE
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one scored the same or higher as 18 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 212,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them