↓ Skip to main content

Methodology for inspection of wood pathologie using ultrasonic pulses

Overview of attention for article published in CERNE, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Methodology for inspection of wood pathologie using ultrasonic pulses
Published in
CERNE, November 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0104-77602012000300016
Authors

Edgar Vladimiro Mantilla Carrasco, Amanda Rocha Teixeira

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#9,380,599
of 27,348,485 outputs
Outputs from CERNE
#4
of 28 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,157
of 198,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CERNE
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,348,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them