↓ Skip to main content

Comparative study of the main flotation frothers using a new HYDROMESS adapted technique

Overview of attention for article published in Rem: Revista Escola de Minas, April 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
14 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative study of the main flotation frothers using a new HYDROMESS adapted technique
Published in
Rem: Revista Escola de Minas, April 2014
DOI 10.1590/s0370-44672014000100013
Authors

Moacir Medeiros Veras, Carlos Adolpho Magalhães Baltar, João Bosco de Araújo Paulo, José Yvan Pereira Leite

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,187,031
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Rem: Revista Escola de Minas
#6
of 55 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,309
of 238,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Rem: Revista Escola de Minas
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,623 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them