↓ Skip to main content

A importância dos níveis de vitamina D nas doenças autoimunes

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 347)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
7 news outlets
twitter
11 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A importância dos níveis de vitamina D nas doenças autoimunes
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, February 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0482-50042010000100007
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In addition to its role in calcium homeostasis, it is believed that the active form of vitamin D has immunomodulatory effects on cells of the immune system, particularly T lymphocytes, as well as on the production and action of several cytokines. The interaction of vitamin D with the immune system has been the target of a growing number of publications in recent years. Current studies have linked the deficiency of vitamin D with different autoimmune diseases, including insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), multiple sclerosis (MS), inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). This article reviews the physiology and immunomodulatory role of vitamin D, emphasizing its involvement in rheumatic diseases such as SLE and RA.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 204 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 62 30%
Student > Master 30 15%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 27 13%
Unknown 45 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 42%
Nursing and Health Professions 17 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 15 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 4%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 74. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2025.
All research outputs
#643,105
of 28,021,203 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#1
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,221
of 186,453 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,021,203 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 186,453 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them