↓ Skip to main content

Prevalência de deficiência de IgA em pacientes adultos com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico e estudo de sua associação com perfil clínico e de autoanticorpos

Overview of attention for article published in Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalência de deficiência de IgA em pacientes adultos com lúpus eritematoso sistêmico e estudo de sua associação com perfil clínico e de autoanticorpos
Published in
Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, June 2010
DOI 10.1590/s0482-50042010000300007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ana Paula França Mantovani, Mariel Perini Monclaro, Thelma L Skare

Abstract

IgA deficiency (IgAD) is the most common primary immunodeficiency, which can cause frequent infections. The association of IgA deficiency with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is very important because of the high morbidity and mortality rates of infections in patients with this disease. To study the prevalence of IgA deficiency in SLE patients from southern Brazil and to compare the clinical and autoantibody profiles of SLE patients with and without IgA deficiency. One hundred and eighty-nine SLE patients were submitted to serum IgA measurement by nephelometry. Levels of IgA below 50mg/dL were considered to be IgAD. Demographic data, clinical profile (presence of arthritis, psychosis, seizures, stroke, serositis, hemolytic anemia, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, and nephritis) and autoantibody profiles (ANA, anti-Ro, anti-La, anti-Sm, anti-DNA, anti-RNP, lupus anticoagulant, and anticardiolipin IgG and IgM) were obtained from reviewing medical records. As control, we used literature data from another study performed in the same geographical area. Data were analyzed through contingency and frequency tables, applying the Chi-square, Fisher, and Mann Whitney tests. IgA deficiency was found in 11 (6.17%) patients (P < 0.001 in relation to controls). The association between IgA deficiency and clinical or autoantibody profile was not significant. We concluded that a higher prevalence of IgA deficiency was observed in lupus patients than in controls. Deficiency of IgA did not have any particular laboratory or clinical effects on this population.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 62%
Student > Postgraduate 2 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 77%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Unknown 2 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#17,729,864
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#3
of 3 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,429
of 107,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.4. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,597 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.