↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of the Pilates method for pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
399 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Efficacy of the Pilates method for pain and disability in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, December 2013
DOI 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000127
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To systematically review the available evidence on the efficacy of the Pilates method in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 399 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 5 1%
Spain 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 389 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 82 21%
Student > Master 64 16%
Student > Postgraduate 42 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 4%
Other 64 16%
Unknown 105 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 79 20%
Sports and Recreations 45 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 4%
Neuroscience 10 3%
Other 31 8%
Unknown 117 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2025.
All research outputs
#1,635,860
of 28,576,962 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#67
of 804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,388
of 333,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,576,962 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.