↓ Skip to main content

Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: a quantitative meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Testicular dysgenesis syndrome and the estrogen hypothesis: a quantitative meta-analysis
Published in
Ciência & Saúde Coletiva, October 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1413-81232008000500024
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olwenn Martin, Tassos Shialis, John Lester, Mark Scrimshaw, Alan Boobis, Nikolaos Voulvoulis

Abstract

Male reproductive tract abnormalities such as hypospadias and cryptorchidism, and testicular cancer have been proposed to comprise a common syndrome together with impaired spermatogenesis with a common etiology resulting from the disruption of gonadal development during fetal life, the testicular dysgenesis syndrome (TDS). The only quantitative summary estimate of the link between prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents and testicular cancer was published over 10 years ago; other reviews of the link between estrogenic compounds, other than the potent pharmaceutical estrogen diethylstilbestrol (DES), and TDS end points have remained inconclusive. We conducted a quantitative meta-analysis of the association between the end points related to TDS and prenatal exposure to estrogenic agents. Inclusion in this analysis was based on mechanistic criteria, and the plausibility of an estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha-mediated mode of action was specifically explored. Eight studies were included, investigating the etiology of hypospadias and/or cryptorchidism that had not been identified in previous systematic reviews. Four additional studies of pharmaceutical estrogens yielded a statistically significant updated summary estimate for testicular cancer. Results of the subset analyses point to the existence of unidentified sources of heterogeneity between studies or within the study population.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 28 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 14%
Professor 3 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 10%
Researcher 3 10%
Other 8 28%
Unknown 4 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 17%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Arts and Humanities 2 7%
Other 2 7%
Unknown 6 21%