You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Biodisponibilidade de minerais
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Revista de Nutrição, March 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1415-52731997000200001 |
| Authors |
Silvia M. Franciscato Cozzolino |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 13% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,205,554
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Revista de Nutrição
#53
of 303 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,669
of 168,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Revista de Nutrição
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 303 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them