You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avaliação cefalométrica das alterações dentoesqueléticas de jovens com má oclusão de Classe II dentária tratados com distalizadores Jones jig
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics, June 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1590/s1415-54192009000300012 |
| Authors |
Mayara Paim Patel, José Fernando Castanha Henriques, Guilherme Janson, Marcos Roberto de Freitas, Renato Rodrigues de Almeida |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 86% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2014.
All research outputs
#22,756,649
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#330
of 459 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,598
of 125,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 459 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 125,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them