↓ Skip to main content

Manufacturing of metallic porous structures to be used in capillary pumping systems

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Research, January 2004
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Manufacturing of metallic porous structures to be used in capillary pumping systems
Published in
Materials Research, January 2004
DOI 10.1590/s1516-14392003000400009
Authors

Eduardo Gonçalves Reimbrecht, Edson Bazzo, Luis Henrique Seabra Almeida, Henrique Cislagui Silva, Cristiano Binder, Joel Louis Rene Muzart

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 72 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Student > Bachelor 2 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 3%
Professor 1 1%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 60 83%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 8%
Materials Science 3 4%
Chemical Engineering 2 3%
Chemistry 1 1%
Unknown 60 83%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2005.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#70
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,854
of 147,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 147,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.