↓ Skip to main content

Effect of salt leaching on PCL and PLGA(50/50) resorbable scaffolds

Overview of attention for article published in Materials Research, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of salt leaching on PCL and PLGA(50/50) resorbable scaffolds
Published in
Materials Research, April 2008
DOI 10.1590/s1516-14392008000100014
Authors

Samuel Hilsdorf Barbanti, Cecília Amélia Carvalho Zavaglia, Eliana Aparecida de Rezende Duek

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Greece 1 2%
Unknown 53 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 31%
Student > Bachelor 11 20%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Student > Master 4 7%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 9 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 21 39%
Materials Science 5 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 6%
Chemistry 3 6%
Chemical Engineering 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 16 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2016.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Materials Research
#70
of 329 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,784
of 89,914 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Materials Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 329 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,914 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them